A New Medium (HistoCold) for Surgical Specimens Preserving to Improve the Preanalytic Issues in Histopathological Samples Handling: Morphologic and Antigenic Analysis.

Introduction: The onset of precision medicine has led to the integration of traditional morphologic tissues evaluation with biochemical and molecular data for a more appropriate pathological diagnosis. The preanalytic phase and, particularly, timing of cold ischemia are crucial to guarantee high-quality biorepositories of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues for patients' needs and scientific research. However, delayed fixation using the gold-standard and carcinogenic fixative neutral-buffered formalin (NBF) can be a significant limitation to diagnosis and biopathological characterization. HistoCold (patented; Bio-Optica Milano S.p.A., Milano, Italy) is a nontoxic, stable, and refrigerated preservative solution for tissue handling. This study examined HistoCold's potential role in improving the preanalytic phase of the pathological diagnostic process. Materials and Methods: Breast, lung, or colorectal cancers (20, 25, and 10 cases, respectively) that were to be surgically resected were recruited between 2019 and 2021. Once specimens were surgically removed, three residual samples for each patient were first promptly immersed into HistoCold for 24, 48, and 72 hours and then FFPE. These were compared with routine specimens regarding morphologic features (hematoxylin and eosin) and tissue antigenicity (immunohistochemical stains). Results: Good concordance regarding both the morphologic characteristics of the neoplasms and their proteins expression between the routine and HistoCold handled tissues were found. The tissue handling with the solution never affected the histopathological diagnosis. Conclusions: The use of HistoCold for samples transporting is easy, allows for improving the management of cold ischemia time, and monitoring the fixation times in NBF, resulting in good quality tissue blocks for biobanking. Moreover, it could be a candidate to eliminate formalin from operating theaters. HistoCold looks very promising for the preanalytic phase of human tissues handling in the era of precision medicine, to provide the best service to patients, and to scientific research.

Looking for more reliable biomarkers in breast cancer: Comparison between routine methods and RT-qPCR.

PURPOSE: Decades of quality control efforts have raised the standards of immunohistochemistry (IHC), the principle method used for biomarker testing in breast cancer; however, computational pathology and reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) may also hold promise for additional substantial improvements. METHODS: Herein, we investigated discrepancies in the assessment of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and marker of proliferation Ki67 comparing routinely obtained IHC (and FISH) data (ORI) with the results of manual (REV) and semi-automated (DIA) re-evaluation of the original IHC slides and then with RNA expression data from the same tissue block using the MammaTyper® (MT) gene expression assay. RESULTS: Correlation for ER and PR was high between ORI IHC and the other three study methods (REV, DIA and RT-qPCR). For HER2, 10 out of 96 discrepant cases can be detected between ORI and REV that involved at least one call in the equivocal category (except for one case). For Ki67, 22 (29.1%) cases were categorized differently by either REV alone (n = 17), DIA alone (n = 15) or both (n = 10) and 28 cases (29.2%) for RT-qPCR. Most of the discrepant Ki67 cases changed from low to high between the original and following assessment and belonged to the intermediate Ki67 expression range (between 9 and 30%). CONCLUSIONS: Determination of the breast cancer biomarkers ER, PR, HER2 and Ki67 at the mRNA level shows high degree of correlation with IHC and compares well with correlations between original with subsequent independent manual or semi-automated IHC assessments. The use of methods with wider dynamic range and higher reproducibility such as RT-qPCR may offer more precise assessment of endocrine responsiveness, improve Ki67 standardization and help resolve HER2 cases that remain equivocal or ambiguous by IHC/FISH. In summary, our findings seem to configure RT-qPCR as a complementary method to be used in cases of either equivocal results or presenting, at the traditional determination assays, biomarkers expressions close to the cut-off values.

The implementation of a commercially available multi-gene profile test for breast cancer characterization in a department of pathology: what have we learned from the first 100 cases?

Analysis of breast cancer prognostic and predictive factors is still nowadays poorly accurate and standardized. The advent of multi-gene expression profiles (MGEPs) has improved the prediction of breast cancer outcome, particularly regarding early luminal breast cancers (LBCs). The availability in our Institute of EndoPredict® (EP), a last-generation prognostic gene signature assay, has prompted us to study a series of LBCs, firstly verifying its reproducibility on six routine representative cases, either presenting non-optimal preanalytical conditions or different tumor samples from the same patient; secondly, correlating EP results on 8 retrospectively recruited samples with patients' follow-up; thirdly, applying prospectively EP on 100 routinely diagnosed cases, assessing the oncologists' and pathologists' attitude toward it. The complete reproducibility of EP on all the samples investigated in the first phase allowed to state that EP overcomes the detrimental effects of an inaccurate pre-analytic phase, determining the most appropriate prognostic and predictive parameters of breast cancer. The second phase confirmed EP as a fundamental tool in guiding therapeutic decision, improving the classical bio-pathological characterization and recovering 38% patients' inadequately managed. Finally, the study disclosed how oncologists sometimes inadequately requested EP, but also how it allows a better stratification of breast cancer otherwise considered poorly aggressive and not requiring an EP test, such as G1 neoplasms or tubular histotype. In conclusion, the introduction of EP test in an Anatomic Pathology Department emerges as a useful tool in routine breast cancer diagnosis, both for the characterization of individual cases and, as a result, for more appropriate therapeutic choices.